The Use of Diversion in Juvenile Justice Settings in Australia: with particular focus on the state of Victoria

by adminicjr | 11/05/2018 3:41 pm

This research is the result of law internship program hosted by Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR) and facilitated by Australian Consortium for ‘In-Country’ Indonesian Studies (ACICIS). This partnership aimed to increase students’ awareness of legal issues that are being discussed in the host country, Indonesia, through a comparative approach with the best practice in Australia.

Focusing on Diversion in the Juvenile Justice System, Indonesian law No. 11 of 2012 on Juvenile Criminal Justice System came into effect in 2014. However, there are several duties that the State are yet to fulfil, for instance the Government Regulations on the Guidelines for the Implementation, Procedures and Coordination of Diversion Programs.

This research shows the best practice of the implementation of diversion programs in Juvenile Justice System in Australia, more specific in the State of Victoria, as Victoria is believed to have the best diversion programs. Drawing on the practice undertaken in Australia, this research can be used as a reference point on Diversion programs by Indonesia, who is working to implement better diversion programs.

Download here[1]

We understand that not everyone has the opportunity to become a supporter of the ICJR. However, should you share a common vision with us, you can be part of our mission to ensure that Indonesia will have a fair, accountable and transparent legal system for all its citizens, without any distinction of social status, political views, skin color, gender, origin, sexual orientation and nationality.

As a little as IDR 15.000 (USD 1.09), you can be part of our mission and support ICJR to keep working to ensure the Indonesian legal system becomes more just, transparent and accountable

Click this link[2]

Artikel Terkait

  • 11/11/2019 ICJR Policy Brief: EU – Indonesia Human Rights Dialogue[3]
  • 23/12/2014 ICLaD Issue No. 2/2014[4]
  • 30/04/2021 Addressing Gender Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System[5]
  • 25/12/2014 ICJR: Children’s Interests are at Stake if the GoI still close the Access to the Discussion of the Draft of Government Regulation on SPPA[6]
  • 03/11/2014 ICLaD Issue No.1/2014[7]

Share this:

Endnotes:
  1. here: http://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Use-of-Diversion-in-Juvenile-Justice-Settings-in-Australia.pdf
  2. link: http://bit.ly/15forjustice
  3. ICJR Policy Brief: EU – Indonesia Human Rights Dialogue: https://icjr.or.id/icjr-policy-brief-eu-indonesia-human-rights-dialogue/
  4. ICLaD Issue No. 2/2014: https://icjr.or.id/iclad-issue-no-2-2014/
  5. Addressing Gender Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System: https://icjr.or.id/addressing-gender-inequalities-in-the-criminal-justice-system/
  6. ICJR: Children’s Interests are at Stake if the GoI still close the Access to the Discussion of the Draft of Government Regulation on SPPA: https://icjr.or.id/icjr-childrens-interests-are-at-stake-if-the-goi-still-close-the-access-to-the-discussion-of-the-draft-of-government-regulation-on-sppa/
  7. ICLaD Issue No.1/2014: https://icjr.or.id/iclad-issue-no-12014/
  8. Tweet: https://twitter.com/share

Source URL: https://icjr.or.id/the-use-of-diversion-in-juvenile-justice-settings-in-australia-with-particular-focus-on-the-state-of-victoria/